About James
James Biggart built a legal education that crosses continents and institutions. He earned a B.A. from the University of Florida in 1990 and spent time at Oxford University in 1992. He holds J.D. degrees from the University of Louisville (1993) and the University of Florida (1994). The sequence suggests a concentrated period of study in the early 1990s and a broad academic background that informs his courtroom work today.
His career has been marked by practice in both trial and appellate settings. Over the years he has secured admission to a wide range of courts. Those admissions include the Florida State Courts and several federal forums: the U.S. Supreme Court, the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, and the U.S. District Courts for the Middle and Northern Districts of Florida. That roster of courts points to experience handling matters that move beyond local dockets and into federal and appellate arenas.
Colleagues describe his approach as direct and methodical. He prepares filings that aim to address the core legal questions and builds hearings around precise themes. He has worked on matters that require attention to procedure as well as substance, and he regularly appears before judges and panels where clarity matters. His practice combines courtroom advocacy and written argument, and he has handled cases that proceed through multiple levels of review.
Biggart practices at Morgan & Morgan. In that setting he is part of a larger team that manages litigation across jurisdictions. He collaborates with trial lawyers, researchers, and support staff to move cases from intake through trial or appeal. The environment at the firm offers access to resources for complex litigation and a structure for coordinating multi-forum matters.
Outside formal admissions and office affiliation, his record shows an attorney comfortable in varied judicial settings. He has navigated matters in state courts and federal tribunals and earned the procedural familiarity those venues demand. He continues to represent clients through trial and appeal processes. His current practice concentrates on litigation handled in state and federal courts.
