About Timothy
Timothy Broking is admitted to practice before the highest courts and specialized tribunals in the United States. He holds admissions to the U.S. Supreme Court, the New Jersey bar and the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Services. Those credentials place him in a small group of lawyers eligible to handle matters that move beyond state trial courts and into federal and military appellate forums.
His career has revolved around appellate advocacy and proceedings that require specialized admissions. Admission to the U.S. Supreme Court allows him to file briefs and seek review at the nation’s highest level. Admission to the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Services authorizes practice before the principal federal appellate court that addresses military justice. Admission in New Jersey permits representation in that state’s trial and appellate system. Each admission reflects procedural competence and the ability to meet court requirements for appearance and briefing.
In practice, Broking’s work involves preparing appellate briefs, arguing complex legal questions and navigating the procedural rules unique to each forum. Oral argument before any appellate body demands concise legal writing and an ability to answer judges’ questions on the spot. Filing in the Supreme Court of the United States requires familiarity with certiorari procedures and the Court’s briefing conventions. Appearing before the Court of Appeals for the Armed Services requires an understanding of the Uniform Code of Military Justice and the specialized appellate rules that apply to service members and military proceedings.
Colleagues and court records indicate that representation in these venues tends to involve a mix of constitutional claims, statutory interpretation and questions of criminal and administrative law as they arise on appeal. Broking’s admissions enable him to represent clients who need appellate work in state courts, federal courts and military appellate tribunals. He practices in settings where the record from trial-level proceedings must be reviewed, where precedent is key, and where the form and timing of filings are often decisive.
As of 2026 he remains active in the bars where he is admitted, engaging in appellate and military justice litigation. His current practice covers appeals and military appellate matters in New Jersey and in federal courts, including the U.S. Supreme Court and the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Services.
