About Tim
Tim Lohmar built a career that moved between courtroom deliberations and public prosecution. He is known locally for a steady presence in Missouri’s legal community and a trajectory that includes both judging and prosecuting.
Lohmar earned his Bachelor of Arts from the University of Missouri–Columbia in 1996 and returned to the same campus for his law degree, receiving a J.D. in 1999. His time at Mizzou coincided with a period of steady growth in Missouri’s bar; the education he received there laid the groundwork for his public-sector roles.
His judicial service began in 2011, when he served as an Associate Circuit Judge for the State of Missouri. In that role he presided over a variety of matters that required case management, evidentiary rulings and written opinions. The position placed him at the center of the county court calendar and involved regular interaction with litigants, attorneys and court staff.
Two years later he took on a role in prosecution, serving as a prosecuting lawyer for St. Charles County in 2013. In that capacity he handled criminal matters on behalf of the county and worked with investigators and victims as cases moved through the system. The move from the bench to the prosecutor’s office gave him direct courtroom advocacy experience alongside his prior judicial perspective.
Throughout his career Lohmar has navigated the practical demands of public service in the legal system. He has worked inside courtrooms and county offices, and he has experience drafting rulings, presenting evidence and arguing matters in front of judges and juries. Those experiences inform how he approaches legal problem solving and case assessment.
Outside of specific job titles, Lohmar’s path reflects a mix of adjudication and advocacy. That combination is relatively uncommon and gives him a vantage point on how cases look from multiple roles within the justice system. Colleagues describe him as methodical and clear in his courtroom work, favoring direct explanation over flourish.
As of 2026, Lohmar maintains a practice grounded in his years on the bench and in the prosecutor’s office. He concentrates his work on matters that draw on his judicial and prosecutorial experience.
