About Marc
Marc Ominsky built his academic foundation across three distinct fields before entering law school. He earned a B.A. from the University of Maryland in 1990, completing coursework in English, Government and Computer Science. That mix of disciplines informed both his analytical approach and his writing. He went on to receive a J.D. from Thomas Cooley Law School in 1996, where he participated in Moot Court, earned an Advocacy Certificate and made the Dean's List.
Those years in law school left a clear imprint. The Moot Court experience offered structured opportunities to brief issues and argue them in front of panels. The Advocacy Certificate acknowledged formal training in courtroom technique. His place on the Dean's List reflected steady academic performance during a demanding program.
Ominsky’s undergraduate studies also shaped his early legal instincts. English sharpened his drafting and editing skills. Government provided grounding in public institutions and statutory structure. Computer science introduced logical problem solving and an appreciation for technical complexity. Combined, these subjects helped him approach legal problems with attention to language, process and systems.
Following graduation, he entered the practice of law. Over the years he developed practical skills in client counseling, legal research and courtroom presentation. He has worked on matters that required written advocacy, oral argument and strategic planning. Those everyday features of practice—interviewing clients, preparing pleadings, arguing motions—are where his courtroom training and writing background intersect.
Colleagues and clients have noted a straightforward style in his work. He tends to favor clear writing and direct oral advocacy. That approach traces back to his undergraduate and law school training. It also shows in how he structures case files and prepares witnesses for testimony.
Outside formal casework he has kept up with changes in law practice and legal writing. His combination of technical literacy from computer science and traditional legal training positions him to handle assignments that require both careful drafting and attention to procedural detail.
He remains an active lawyer. Today he practices law in private practice, handling client counseling, litigation work and legal drafting as part of his ongoing practice focus.
