About Greg
Greg Dow built his legal foundation on a Midwestern campus and finished his formal training at one of the country's long-established law schools. He earned a Bachelor of Science from Washington State University in 1973, where he served on the All-University Senate, and completed his Juris Doctor at Georgetown University in 1978. Those years shaped an approach to law that blends classroom study with practical student governance experience.
The Washington State University record hints at early leadership. Serving on the All-University Senate placed him among peers involved in campus policy and student representation. He carried that engagement forward to Georgetown, where three years of study culminated in a J.D. in the late 1970s. The timing placed him among a generation of lawyers who entered practice as the legal landscape adjusted to new regulatory and economic pressures.
After earning his degree in 1978, he began a steady career in the legal profession. Over decades he has worked in different roles and settings, bringing a steady hand to the cases and matters he accepted. His practice over time reflected the patterns common to attorneys who trained in Washington, D.C., and who returned to regional practice: combining research, client counseling and courtroom preparation as cases required.
Clients and colleagues describe him as methodical. He favors careful legal analysis, thorough factual development and attention to procedure. Those habits matter in litigation and in transactional work alike. He has handled matters that demanded persistent case management and attention to deadlines. He also values clear writing and plainspoken explanation when dealing with judges, opposing counsel and clients.
Outside of case files, his undergraduate governance role remained a reference point. It informed how he communicates and how he evaluates institutional decisions. He has drawn on that experience when advising organizations and individuals, especially where institutional process and policy shape legal outcomes.
Over a long career, he has kept pace with changing legal practice. He learned and adapted to shifts in technology, court procedure and substantive law. That adaptability has shaped how he organizes work and prepares for hearings or negotiations.
As of 2026, he remains active in the legal profession and continues to practice law, handling matters that draw on decades of experience.
