About George P.
George P. Conway built his path to the law from a mix of technical training and liberal arts study. He began at Morrisville State College, earning an A.A.S. in 1983. He moved on to the State University of New York at Albany and completed a B.A. in 1985. He then enrolled at Western New England University School of Law and received his J.D. in 1991. In 1996 he completed a program at the National Institute for Trial Advocacy, a course that sharpened his skills for courtroom work.
After law school Conway established himself in New York. He is admitted to practice in that jurisdiction and has spent his career there. Early on he balanced research and client work, then added trial training to his professional toolbox. The NITA experience is reflected in the way he approaches contested matters and court appearances.
His practice has moved through different kinds of legal work. He has handled preparation for hearings, drafted pleadings and taken part in trials and evidentiary proceedings. He has also advised clients on procedural strategy and the steps that precede litigation. Colleagues say he prefers clear, practical explanations when preparing a case and addressing judges.
He joined The Kamen Center, where he maintains an office and works on litigation-related matters. At the center he contributes to case strategy, courtroom presentations and client counseling. The office serves a New York clientele and he spends much of his time preparing for and appearing in court.
Conway’s educational background includes both technical and academic training, a combination that he applies to the details of casework. The sequence of degrees and postgraduate trial instruction point to an attorney comfortable both with written advocacy and oral presentation. His work style is straightforward, aimed at making complex procedures more accessible to clients.
Outside of the courthouse he continues to follow developments in trial practice and procedural law. He is known to participate in continuing education that reinforces courtroom techniques and evidence rules. He remains active in practice at The Kamen Center in New York, where his work focuses on courtroom representation and related legal matters.
