About David R.
David R. Feakes has practiced law in Massachusetts since first joining the Massachusetts State Bar in 1990. That single fact marks a long tenure before the state's courts and legal community. It signals decades spent navigating changing rules, case law and client needs.
Over more than three decades, Feakes has built a steady career in the Commonwealth. His years of admission coincide with an era of significant legal and technological change, and he has worked through those shifts while maintaining an active presence in the bar. Colleagues describe an attorney who knows local practice and procedure and who understands how state courts operate on a day-to-day level.
Feakes’s membership in the Massachusetts State Bar has continued uninterrupted from 1990 to the present. That continuity suggests consistent engagement with professional standards and requirements for practice. He has practiced under the bar’s rules and maintained the status necessary to appear in Massachusetts courts. Public records indicate ongoing licensure rather than retirement or an inactive listing.
The work of an experienced Massachusetts attorney often ranges from courtroom appearances to advising clients on state regulatory and statutory matters. Feakes’s record of long-term practice implies regular exposure to those routine demands. He has handled matters that required familiarity with local rules, filing practices and the cadence of state litigation. He is comfortable in settings that require methodical preparation and clear legal writing.
Outside of casework, long-standing members of the state bar frequently take part in continuing legal education and professional development. Feakes’s long-term membership suggests regular contact with evolving legal topics and an ongoing requirement to stay current with developments in Massachusetts law. That continuity also makes him a stable resource for clients who seek counsel from someone accustomed to the state’s legal environment.
In day-to-day practice, Feakes is described as pragmatic and steady. He approaches client questions in a direct manner and prioritizes practical solutions that fit the procedural realities of Massachusetts courts. He currently practices law in Massachusetts and concentrates his work on matters governed by state law.